Stimulated recall method and ICTs

Data gathering methods such as interview and video observation are employed a lot in research on teaching. Stimulated recall interview method (which is widely used at the University of Helsinki Department of Teacher Education, e.g. Toom 2006) combines video and interview so that when interviewing a teacher, a video of her/his lesson is displayed for closer focus on teacher’s actions during the teaching. However, there is a risk of concentrating too much on teacher and forgetting the most important aspect of all classroom activities – the student learning. Therefore, in addition to video-stimuli, another valuable cue for interview situation can be screenshots from the student desktops.

In a computer lab environment (as partly in my PhD project), some practical advices for data gathering with stimulated recall method were spotted:

  • The video recording of the lesson gives a good overview of the classroom situations but does not necessarily highlight the students’ learning processes.
  • Where students are using ICTs, there is special screenshot software (e.g. InstantShot! for Mac) for capturing all the events on the computer screens. However, integrating that data into the interview situation might need quite a lot of data processing on the computer before the data are in a sensible format for stimulated recall purposes.
  • When the software that students are using, has a playback or recorder function as in CmapTools software, the process is very easy to recall by opening the file saved by the student and playing the recorded steps of the process. With the recorder function, both interviewer and interviewee can ‘play’, ‘pause’, or navigate to particular steps in the recording using the ‘back’ and ‘forward’ buttons.
  • During the interview, the actual interplay between video and concept map recordings takes place as ‘diving’ into a student’s learning process. The concept map recordings are used to get closer to the student’s learning process when the student is on the video or the interviewed teacher is recalling something from the lesson related to that student.

>> An example of (fast forwarded) CmapTools playback of student’s concept map process.

Read more:

Vesterinen, O., Toom, A. & Patrikainen, S. (2010). The stimulated recall method and ICTs in research on the reasoning of teachers. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(2), pp. 183–197.

Meediahariduse seminar Tallinnas

Tallinn University had a media education seminar

Tallinn University had a media education seminar in September 3–4, 2009. Interesting that Estonia is following the way our National Core Curriculum in Basic Education (2004) is taking the cross-curricular themes in.

I participated the sessions on both days. The following presentations (actually first Mac OS X Keynote presentations I’ve done!) are available on SlideShare.

JURE conference in Amsterdam

Presentation @ Junior Researchers of EARLI conference (JURE)

First time in Junior Researchers of EARLI conference (JURE). I have a round-table presentation on Monday. The title is ‘Media Education in School Context.’

>> vesterinen_JURE2009_handout

Should be nice and warm in Amsterdam – a lovely city altogether. Expecting a lot from this week.

Biking in Amsterdam

(photo from the previous trip to Amsterdam)

An update on my PhD research

Last year I was gathering data from a school in eastern part of Helsinki. I visited two parallel classes whenever they had some media related activities. In my research sense, the class projects I followed were in three topics:

  • Analysing a movie and creating digital stories
  • Reading newspapers and writing an own issue
  • Analysing and constructing conceptions and knowledge with collaborative concept mapping software (CmapTools)

I video recorded the lessons and gathered other prompt material (such as recorded processes of concept map creation and finished digital stories) for stimulated recall interviews which took place later that same day. In the interview, teacher and I went through the lesson and media education related topics with the cues from the video and other prompt material.

I’ve been hearing and reading fairly long time about the problem in Finnish (and other countries’) media education: teachers, schools and teacher education. I am interested in learning what teachers and schools suggest is the reasoning around the school-based media education and the absence of all the things that media educationalists cry out for. From my perspective the meaningfulness of our school system doesn’t seem to be in the up-to-date fashionable roles and topics but in the continuity of something which still remains strong in our (citizens’, parents’, school administratives’, etc.) minds, i.e. school institution and its social practices.

As I’m starting to analyse the interview data, I’m trying to find following types of arguments.

>> see figure

We’ll see if I’ll find those.

Mediakasvatus.nyt Jyväskylässä

Kolmas Mediakasvatus.nyt-seminaari järjestettiin tällä kertaa Jyväskylässä. Järjestäjinä Mediakasvatusseura, JAMK, HUMAK ja JY. Pidin tutkimustyöpajassa esityksen Stimulated recall -tutkimusmenetelmän käytöstä opettajan mediakasvatuksellisten ratkaisujen ja perustelujen tutkimuksessa.

>> esityksen käsitekartat

>> pieni raportti muista esityksistä jaikussa

Two articles

Two new publications include contributions by me and my colleagues.

Kynäslahti, H., Vesterinen, O. & Tella, S. 2007. Mediakasvatuksen näkökulma informaatiolukutaitoon (Information Literacy from the Perspective of Media Education). In A. Nevgi (Ed.) Informaatiolukutaito yliopisto-opetuksessa. (Information Literacy in Higher Education.) Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 71–80.
>> orders bookplus.fi

The other one is available online.

Vesterinen, O. 2007. Mediakasvatus oppilaitosinstituution yhte(nä)isenä alueena. (Media Education as a Shared/Wholistic Area of School Institution.) In H. Kynäslahti, R. Kupiainen & M. Lehtonen (Eds.) Näkökulmia mediakasvatukseen (Points of View of Media Education). The Finnish Society on Media Education, 73–85.
www.mediaeducation.fi/publications/

Web 2.0 ja omaehtoisuus -esitys

Pidimme yhteisesityksen Mediakasvatuksen teemaryhmässä Kasvatustieteen päivillä Vaasassa 22.11.2007.

http://kosmar.de/archives/2005/11/11/the-huge-cloud-lens-bubble-map-web20/

Esitys on Helsingin yliopiston Mediakasvatuskeskuksen tutkimuksesta, jossa mediakasvatuksen opiskelijoilta kysyttiin web 2.0:aan liittyviä asioita, opiskelijoiden aktiivisuutta web 2.0 -palvelujen käyttäjinä ja web 2.0:n vaikutuksista medialukutaitoon ja sen opettamiseen.

MedSt@r – Media Education Research Using Stimulated Recall Method

Stimulated Recall Method (Str) has been used to investigate teacher’s pedagogical thinking. Method is used to revive memories after the lesson in order to determine the thoughts which occurred during the lesson. The idea is that an interviewee “may be enabled to relive an original situation with vividness and accuracy if he [or she] is presented with a large number of the cues or stimuli which occurred during the original situation” (Bloom, 1953, p. 161).

These cues can be e.g. books used or a video recording of the lesson. In media education reseach there is a need for summoning up the virtual elements of a class too. E.g. in our MedSt@r Project the class was using CmapTools. After the lesson, we have used CmapTools recorder function with the teacher to follow step by step how each pupil has created his/her cmap (i.e. a concept map file).

The project in whole investigates
a) features of using Stimulated Recall Method in media education research, and
b) on a meta-level – what decisions researcher does and how is s/he reasoning those.

>> to cmaps of my presentation in a post-graduate seminar Oct 29th (in Finnish).

Media education and subject didactics

The research focused on each school subject and its teaching is called subject didactics. Media education is not a subject of its own in Finnish primary schools, but you can however analyse the subject didactics of media education. This relates to my earlier entry about teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge.

Here’s a summary of an article accepted to ‘Ainedidaktinen symposiumi’ publication 2006, which is due to be out in January 2007. >> summary in Finnish